**Next message:**Pablo Sanchez Puertas: "Re: SImplifications with Levi Civita tensors"**Previous message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Dirac Trace Problem"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dear FeynCalc users,

it is well known, that using several Mathematica packages doing similar

things on the same kernel often leads to shadowing issues.

For example, a lot of high energy physics packages introduce functions

like Contract, FourVector, DiracMatrix etc., which subsequently clash

with the definitions of these functions in FeynCalc.

Normally, my solution to this is either to rename

offending functions in the other packages (as it is done with FeynArts),

or to write an interface to those packages, so that one access their

functions via new names (as it is done in FeynHelpers).

Recently, I was made aware of the fact, that sometimes people would like

to use a specific package on the same kernel with FeynCalc but to do it

in such a way, that their existing codes for that package can work

without any changes.

Suppose that a package XYZ defines "Pair" and "DiracGamma", which makes

it inherently incompatible with FeynCalc. If you prefer not to change

your existing codes for package XYZ, you could, in principle, patch

FeynCalc to rename Pair and DiracGamma to something else. Of course,

this makes your instance of FeynCalc incompatible to all the existing

codes and addons. On the other hand, the patched FeynCalc will work as

usual, with the exception that whenever you need to access Pair or

DiracGamma, you must remember to use different names.

Now it is possible to patch FeynCalc on-the-fly while loading the

package, i.e. the changes in the names of FeynCalc functions are not

persistent and the source code of FeynCalc on your hard drive is not

modified. Once you restart the kernel, everything will be as it was.

Certainly, this functionality is meant only for people who very well

understand what they are doing. Yet, if the conflicting FeynCalc

function is something that you anyhow never use, this trick can still be

quite useful.

You also have to keep in mind, that if your package XYZ modifies the

default behavior of Mathematica's functions and variables in some

non-trivial way, it might still be incompatible with FeynCalc, even

though there will be now shadowing issues.

Anyhow, the magic variable (now available in the development version) is

"$RenameFeynCalcObjects"

Some examples:

1) Load FeynCalc and Package-X on the same kernel

$RenameFeynCalcObjects = {"Contract" -> "FCContract",

"DiracMatrix" -> "FCDiracMatrix"};

<< FeynCalc`

<< X`

Notice that now FeynCalc completely ignores Contract and DiracMatrix

DiracMatrix[\[Gamma].p1 + me \[DoubleStruckOne],

Subscript[\[Gamma], \[Mu]], \[Gamma].p2 - me \[DoubleStruckOne],

Subscript[\[Gamma], \[Nu]]] // Tr

DiracMatrix[\[Gamma].p1 + me \[DoubleStruckOne],

Subscript[\[Gamma], \[Mu]], \[Gamma].p2 - me \[DoubleStruckOne],

Subscript[\[Gamma], \[Nu]]] // Spur

Contract[Subscript[k, \[Mu]] Subscript[k, \[Mu]]]

FCContract[FV[k, mu] FV[k, mu]]

2) Load FeynCalc and Tracer on the same kernel

$RenameFeynCalcObjects = {"Eps" -> "FCEps"};

<< FeynCalc`

<< Tracer`

?Eps

Eps[arg1,arg2,arg3,arg4] is the completely antisymmetric product of

the four arguments "arg1-4". Eps[] is multi-linear with respect to

a linear combination with scalar coefficients. Arguments of Eps[]

can be a mixture of Lorentz indices and momenta, e.g.

"Eps[[p,{mu},q,{nu}]" means "Eps_{alpha mu beta nu} p^alpha q^beta"

in a standard physics notation.

3) Load FeynCalc and FIRE on the same kernel

$RenameFeynCalcObjects = {"Contract" -> "FCContract"};

<< FeynCalc`

<< FIRE5`

4) Load FeynCalc and S@M at the same kernel

$RenameFeynCalcObjects = {"Schouten" -> "FCSchouten",

"Gamma1" -> "FCGamma1", "Gamma2" -> "FCGamma2",

"Gamma3" -> "FCGamma3"};

<< FeynCalc`

$SpinorsPath =

FileNameJoin[{$UserBaseDirectory, "Applications", "Spinors"}];

<< Spinors`

Happy FeynCalc hacking ;)

Cheers,

Vladyslav

**Next message:**Pablo Sanchez Puertas: "Re: SImplifications with Levi Civita tensors"**Previous message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Dirac Trace Problem"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 12/17/18-09:00:01 AM Z CET
*