**Next message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Simplest examples?"**Previous message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: FeynArts using Feyncalc"**Maybe in reply to:**Juan Carlos Calvo Jackson: "Gamma Matrices"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

There is nothing special about gamma matrices in FeynCalc. The

thing is just that ComplexConjugate is meant to be applied on only

closed spinor chains, i.e. expressions of type ubar.(gamma matrices).v

that usually appear in a matrix element and not on single gamma matrices.

The two examples you quoted make perfect sense if you consider that

GA[5] and GA[i] are inside a closed spinor chain. For example

(ubar.g^5.v)* = (u^*_i g^0_ij g^5_jk v_k)* =

u_i g^(0*)_ij g^(5*)_jk v^*_k

since g^0 is hermitian, i.e.

(g^0_ij)* = g^(0 \dagger)_ji = g^0_ji

we get

(ubar.g^5.v)* = v^*_k g^(5 \dagger)_kj g^0_ji u_i =

- v^*_k g^0_kl g^5_lm g^0_mj g^0_ji u_i =

- v^*_k g^0_kl g^5_li u_i = - (vbar.g^5.u)

where I used that g^5\dagger = - g^0 g^5 g^0.

Cheers,

Vladyslav

*> Hi,
*

*> How are gamma matrices defined in Feyncalc?
*

*> Becouse in a standard definition (the one by wikipedia for example) we have
*

*> ComplexConjugate[GA[5]]=GA[5] and ComplexConjugate[GA[i]]=GA[0]GA[i]GA[0] ,i=0,1,2,3.
*

*>
*

*> whereas in Feyncalc
*

*> ComplexConjugate[GA[5]]=-GA[5] and ComplexConjugate[GA[i]]=GA[i].
*

*>
*

*> Thanks.
*

**Next message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Simplest examples?"**Previous message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: FeynArts using Feyncalc"**Maybe in reply to:**Juan Carlos Calvo Jackson: "Gamma Matrices"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 11/19/17-03:00:02 PM Z CET
*