• Next message: Tony: "Indices"
• Previous message: Hrayr Matevosyan: "Re: Frustrating problem with Tr[0.]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I have a little problem with PaVe function. Consider the follow

fd = Pair[LorentzIndex[\[Mu]1], Momentum[q1]]*
    FeynAmpDenominator[PropagatorDenominator[Momentum[q1, D], MG],
      PropagatorDenominator[Momentum[p3, MB] + Momentum[q1, D], MB],
      PropagatorDenominator[
        Momentum[p3, D] + Momentum[p4, D] + Momentum[q1, D], MT]]

res2 = OneLoop[q1, fd]

I*Pi^2*(Pair[LorentzIndex[\[Mu]1], Momentum[p3]]*
   PaVe[1, {Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]] + 2*Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p4]] +
      Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]], Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]],
     Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]]}, {MG^2, MT^2, MB^2}] +
  Pair[LorentzIndex[\[Mu]1], Momentum[p4]]*
   PaVe[1, {Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]] + 2*Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p4]] +
      Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]], Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]],
     Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]]}, {MG^2, MT^2, MB^2}] +
  Pair[LorentzIndex[\[Mu]1], Momentum[p3]]*
   PaVe[2, {Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]] + 2*Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p4]] +
      Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]], Pair[Momentum[p4], Momentum[p4]],
     Pair[Momentum[p3], Momentum[p3]]}, {MG^2, MT^2, MB^2}])

the result, in a form for the eye roughly, is

p3*PaVe(1, etc)+p3*PaVe(2,etc)+p4*PaVe(1,etc), with the same etc for
all. In my opinion should be p4*PaVe(2,etc) and only one term for
p3, or in other words , p3*PaVe(1,etc)+p3*PaVe(1,etc).
p3=p3^(mu)

Sorry if my question does not make sense.

• Next message: Tony: "Indices"
• Previous message: Hrayr Matevosyan: "Re: Frustrating problem with Tr[0.]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 09/04/20-12:55:05 AM Z CEST