• Next message: Tae-il Hur: "Trace with Gamma 5 ( ver.5beta1)"
• Previous message: Jon Palmer: "RE: Is a bug?"
• In reply to: Jon Palmer: "RE: Is a bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dear Jon,
I am not sure, but probably a workaround is better.
I also attach the notebook I made up yesterday for Jaime where a more
involved trace-functions than just TR[Calc[#]]& was needed.
Regards,
Rolf

Jon Palmer wrote:

>Dear Rolf,
>
>We appreciate the help understanding these trace bugs.
>
>Does this bug persist if the traces result from calculating amplitudes using
>FeyArts/Phi. For instance in the following example
>
>tops = CreateTopologies[args]
>inserts = InsertFields[tops, ....]
>ampFA = CreateFeynAmp[inserts, ....]
>ampFC = FAToFC[ampFA, DiracTraceEvaluate -> True]
>
>
>Can we assume that the traces in ampFC will be evaluated properly or is a
>workaround required?
>
>Many thanks
>Jon Palmer
>
>
>
>

• application/mathematica attachment: TRAC1-1RM.nb

• Next message: Tae-il Hur: "Trace with Gamma 5 ( ver.5beta1)"
• Previous message: Jon Palmer: "RE: Is a bug?"
• In reply to: Jon Palmer: "RE: Is a bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 09/04/20-12:55:05 AM Z CEST